Wisconsin's Tax Incremental Finance Law:
Lending a Hand to Blighted
Areas of Turning Cornfields into Parking Lots?
1000 Friends of Wisconsin
October 1999
Summary
Main points of this report:
-
Forty-five percent of tax incremental financing districts (TID)
have been used to develop open space land.
-
Approximately 30,000 acres of open space have been developed using
tax incremental financing (TIF) subsidies.
-
Large corporations and big box retailers are often beneficiaries
of public subsidies using TIF.
-
Four of ten communities are in violation of TIF limits under Wisconsin
law.
-
TIF needs to be refocused on its original intent of helping the
redevelopment of blighted urban areas.
Wisconsin enacted its Tax Incremental Finance (TIF) law in 1975 (s.66.46,
Wis. Stats.). Since then, cities and villages throughout the state have
created 849 tax incremental finance districts (TIDs). As of November 1998,
there were 661 active TIF districts. The original intent of the TIF law
was to create incentives for cities and villages (towns cannot use TIF)
to finance urban redevelopment and blight elimination projects and to promote
industry. However, state data show that many of these districts are created
using open space land on the edges of cities and villages. As a result,
TIF is often subsidizing sprawl rather than promoting the redevelopment
of urban areas.
1000 Friends of Wisconsin conducted research in January 1999 to discover
how much open space land has been developed using TIF. Research findings
indicate that nearly half (302 of 661) of active TIF districts were originally
created using some portion of open space land. We estimate that 30,000 acres
of Wisconsin's open space land has been developed using TIF in these 302
districts.
Under TIF, cities and villages pay for infrastructure improvements and
then they are paid back with the tax proceeds of the new development.
The property tax proceeds are calculated by figuring the difference between
the base value of the property before improvements and the value after
improvement and development (the tax increment). The city or village
keeps all of the increment until the improvements are paid off. Other
taxing jurisdictions (school districts, counties and technical colleges)
receive taxes only on the original base value until the TIF is paid off
and retired.
TIF is administered at the state level by the Wisconsin Department of
Revenue. The agency monitors the technical and procedural requirements
in establishing TIDs although the agency cannot review or evaluate substantive
documentation. A TID is developed through the following steps: 1) The
city plan commission creates the project plan, holds a public hearing
on it and recommends the district boundaries to the city council or village
board; 2) The council/board reviews the plan and formally creates the
district. In doing so, it must find that 50% or more of the real property
in the district is blighted, in need of rehabilitation or conservation
or is suitable and zoned for industrial use, and the project should enhance
the value of all other property in the district; 3) Finally, a joint
review board is created. In order to approve the district, the board
must find: a) The development would not have occurred without the district;
b) The economic benefits of the district are sufficient to compensate
for the costs of the improvements; c) The benefits outweigh the tax increments
to be paid by the taxpayers.
After the TID has been created the Department of Revenue calculates
the "tax increment base value" of the TID. This is the equalized value
of all the taxable property at the time the TID is created. If the development
occurring in the TID increases the value of the property above the TID
base level the difference between the new value and the base value is
the tax increment. This tax increment is used to pay back the costs associated
with initiating the tax incremental district incurred by the municipality.
These municipal investments might include sewers, streets, lighting systems,
financing costs, site preparation and professional service costs.
Land Value After Development
- Land Value at Time of TID Creation
_________________________________
= Tax Increment
The Department of Revenue permits the allocation of tax increments until
the TID terminates OR 23 years (in certain cases, 27 years) after the
TID is created, whichever is sooner. A TID is required to terminate once
the costs incurred by the municipality are paid back, 16 years or 20
years after the last expenditure identified in the project plan is made
or when the municipality dissolves the TID, whichever happens first.
In early 1999, 1000 Friends of Wisconsin reviewed the Department of
Revenue active TIF project files to determine the portion of TIDs that
were originally created using open space land. When they submit project
packages to the DOR, local governments must identify the value and acres
in categories of land within the project area. 1000 Friends counted the
number of districts that included open space land. It was found that
out of the 661 active districts, 302 were developed using some portion
of land classified as "agricultural", "forest" or "swamp" land. These
302 districts included a total of about 30,000 acres of open space land
The vast majority was classified as agricultural land.
In examining information at the Department of Revenue, 1000 Friends
found that 146 out of 347 (42%) municipalities with at least one TID
are in violation of statutory limits on the value of TIDs as a percentage
of total property values. These limits were put in place to protect taxpayers
and other taxing jurisdictions from over-use of TIF.
State law sets caps on the overall value of TIDs in a municipality as
follows:
1. Base value of proposed TID plus the current value of existing TIDs
in the municipality must be 7% or less of the municipality's TOTAL EQUALIZED
VALUE
Base Value Proposed TID
+ Current Value of Existing TIDs
____________________________________
7% or less of Municipality's Total Equalized Value
2. The base value of the proposed TID and the increment of existing
TIDs is 5% or less of the municipality's total value.
Base Value Proposed TID
+ Increment Values of Existing TIDs
___________________________________
5% or less of Municipality's Total Equalized Value
One hundred and forty-seven municipalities were above both the 5% and
7% statutory limits. Under state law, no more TIDs or TID expansions
should occur until values fall below these limits. However, no state
agency is charged with enforcing these limits.
Four Brief Case Studies
TIF At Its Best: Redeveloping A Blighted Urban Area
Milwaukee: King Drive
Created in mid-1990, this district provided a $400,000 loan to assist
converting a long-vacant property located at North King Drive and West
Garfield Street into 41 apartments for low and moderate income families,
as well as 14,000 square feet of office and commercial space. All apartments
and commercial units have been leased. It is expected that the district
will be closed out by 2011.
"This project managed to save buildings for an important social
purpose. It might have been more economical to have torn them down.
However, a new building probably would have never had the same richness,
sense of quality and sense of place that this project has." Jury
Comment, "The Wisconsin Architect", 1998
TIF At Its Worst: Subsidies For Big Box Retailers
Oconomowoc: Target Warehouse
In 1990 Oconomowoc’s TID #2, near the intersection of Highway
67 and Interstate 94, was authorized. The estimated cost for project
improvements was $19,956,275. The improvements made by the city to encourage
development in this area included site grading, interceptor sewer, water
main and well, storm sewer, streets and amenities, electric, development
incentives, administrative costs, and relocation costs. This TID is still
active, with an estimated close out year of 2005, fifteen years after
authorization according to the original project plan.
Since authorization, TID #2 is now home to the following businesses:
Fashion Bug, M&I Bank, Super Subs, Cost Cutters, and, the primary
reason for creation of the district, a Target Distribution Center. The
Target warehouse was highly controversial at the time of its development
with much of the community opposed to its construction on the basis of
truck traffic, community character and increased development pressure
which they believed would accompany the development.
A question can be raised about Target’s need for a public subsidy.
According to the corporation’s website, it is a division of Dayton
Hudson Corporation, "one of the nation’s largest general merchandise
retailers". The website reports that Dayton Hudson operates nearly 1,200
stores in 44 states and that corporate 1998 revenue was $30.95 billion.
Now, Oconomowoc is considering expanding TID 2 to include development
of part of the historic 1,500 acre Pabst Farms across Highway 67. This
TID expansion would subsidize WISPARK, a division of the WEPCO utility
and one of Wisconsin’s largest corporations.
The City of Oconomowoc’s project plan promises: "The city intends
that TIF will be used to assure only high quality corporate management,
industrial, distribution and related private development locates in
this section. High quality means aesthetically pleasing, long-lasting
structures. The goal is to provide and preserve middle and upper income
employment for the city. Without TIF the anticipated development in
the area would be fast food and other travel related establishments."
Madison: Woodmans Warehouse Food Chain
Madison’s TID #11 on Gammon Road was created in 1983. The project
plan objectives were to "enhance the promotion of efficient and economic
use of the land". In order to achieve this, infrastructure improvements
including street improvement, water main, storm and sanitary sewer improvements,
and sidewalk improvements were made to the Gammon Road area in preparation
for construction of a Woodman's Supermarket. The estimated cost for improvements
was $1,152,153. This district has already closed out.
Residents of the surrounding area noted that within the period since
this warehouse food chain store opened, 10 small to mid-sized grocery
stores have closed on Madison’s west side. Small grocery stores
already face price competition from large retailers. A public subsidy
for building only increases the competitive advantages for large retailers.
Baraboo: Wal-Mart Super Store
Baraboo’s new TID # 6 was approved by the city and the joint review
board in the summer of 1999. Final approval is pending review by the
DOR. The district is located near the intersection of Highway 12 and
County W. Wal-Mart and a Slumberland Distribution Center are the two
major projected occupants for this development. A cornfield and old apple
orchard are the current occupants. The estimated TIF project cost is
$5,768,000. These costs include detention basin and water tower construction,
interior roads, connection to water main, and Highway 12 improvements
among others.
What makes this project controversial is that Wal-Mart already has a
store in Baraboo and is looking to construct a brand new Wal-Mart Superstore
(supermarket and discount department store) at this new location approximately
two miles from the current store and close the current location. Additionally,
the Wal-Mart project would have occurred without TIF, according to a
letter written by Wal-Mart's Corporate Real Estate Manager. (see addenda)
State law requires that the joint review board make a finding that the
project would not have happened without the TIF subsidy.
Again, a serious question can be raised about Wal-Mart’s need
for a public subsidy. The corporation’s website boasts in part, "Wal-Mart
has just completed its best year ever, with sales of over $137 billion,
which is almost $20 billion more than last year. More importantly, earnings
per share increased by 27%… and the company paid dividends of
almost $700 million."
This orchard in Baraboo will be developed into a Wal-Mart Super Store
using TIF; a subsidy even Wal-Mart concedes they don’t need.
The Root of the Problem
In his message upon signing the law (Chapter 105, 1975), Governor Patrick
Lucey wrote that, "The intention of the bill as it was introduced was
to provide an additional means of redeveloping areas which are primarily
urban in character." However, the law contains a loophole which allows
its use virtually anywhere. Section 66.46 allows TIF to be used if at
least 50% of the area to be included in a TID is blighted, in need of
rehabilitation or suitable for industrial sites. This last provision, "suitable
for industrial sites", makes TIF usable for the development of any open
space land where services can be provided. To redirect the law to its
original purpose, policy makers might consider eliminating this phrase
from the law.
Sources
1000 Friends of Wisconsin. "Tax Incremental Financing."
Department of City Development, "City of Milwaukee Annual TIF Report" City
of Milwaukee: Milwaukee, 1999
Target website at www.target.com reviewed
on October 19, 1999.
Wal-Mart website at www.wal-mart.com reviewed
on October 19, 1999.
"Wisconsin Architect," 69:4, AIA Wisconsin, Madison, 1998.
Wisconsin Department of Revenue. "Statement of Changes in TID Value." Bureau
of Equalization: Madison, 1998 & 1999
|