1000 Friends of Wisconsin
16 N. Carroll Street
Suite 810
Madison WI 53703
608-259-1000
General Email
|
Where’s Tommy?
With Republican candidates for Governor savaging a high speed rail link between Madison and Milwaukee, it’s fair to ask “where is the ubiquitous former Governor Tommy Thompson?” After all, the popular Republican was elected to the state’s highest office four times while promoting better passenger rail service for Wisconsin.
For those who may have forgotten, here is what Governor Thompson had to say about high speed passenger rail in October of 2000:
WASHINGTON, Oct. 11 /PRNewswire/ –
Amtrak’s Board Chairman Governor Tommy G. Thompson made the following statement on today’s designation of national high speed rail corridors by the U.S. Department of Transportation:
“With more Americans traveling by train today than any time in a generation, these are exciting times for passenger rail service in our nation. Today’s designations continue our course to a comprehensive high-speed passenger rail system that is fully integrated into our national transportation system, alleviates congestion – the condition of a network when there is not enough bandwidth to support the current traffic load.”
 Former Wisconsin Governor Thompson
That was then and this is now, I guess. Except that rail is even more important today than it was 2000. Gasoline prices have skyrocketed since the halcyon days of 2000, making alternatives to the car more desirable and competitive. Our demographics are shifting, too – we have more elderly today than a decade ago, many of whom have more difficulty driving, especially at night. Rail is an attractive option for those who are challenged by driving long distances.
Of course, just being able to be connected by rail to other major cities is a tremendous advantage at any time. The intercity rail connection will make travel easier and cheaper than driving.
Wisconsin has been awarded $810 million for the passenger rail project. While there will be ongoing costs that could cost the state as much as $10 million a year, this pales with the $1.4 billion Wisconsinites currently pay in property taxes for highways.
Tommy knows that rail is good for Wisconsin – he said so for many years.
Have Scott Walker and Mark Neumann kidnapped the irrepressible Tommy Thompson? If not, those of us who were heartened by his tireless advocacy for rail sure wish he would speak up and take the partisanship out of passenger rail service in Wisconsin.
 A new report, released by the American Public Transportation Association, which surveys current research has found that people who live in communities with high-quality public transportation drive less, exercise more, live longer, and are generally healthier than residents of communities that lack quality public transit.
Evaluating Public Transportation Health Benefits, a study conducted for APTA by Todd Litman of the Victoria Transport Policy Institute aggregates the findings of several recent studies and concludes that people living in transit-oriented “smart growth” communities enjoy several health benefits, not seen in other communities, including residents drive less, exposing them to a lower risk of fatal vehicle accidents.
Such communities also have less pollution, because public transportation produces far less emissions per passenger mile than private automobiles. In addition, people who live near quality public transit are more likely to undertake regular physical activity than residents of automobile-dependent communities.
“Public transportation enhances the overall quality of life of an individual and a community,” said APTA president William Millar. “Use of public transit simply means that you walk more which increases fitness levels and leads to healthier citizens. More importantly, increasing use of public transit may be the most effective traffic safety counter measure a community can employ.”
The APTA report notes, transportation activity also plays a role in lessening an individual’s risk in five of the 10 leading causes of reduced lifespan, as identified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). A recent CDC study evaluated causes of potential years of life lost, including cancer, heart disease, motor vehicle crashes, and other causes. For example, “Pollution contributes to cancer and congenital anomalies [birth defects], and sedentary living … contributes to heart disease and strokes,” Litman wrote.
One solution is smart growth communities, according to Litman, who cited a 2003 study finding that urban residents had significantly lower violent death rates, whether from vehicle accidents or other causes.
Litman also noted that the 10 U.S. counties with the “smartest,” most transit-oriented growth have approximately one-fourth the traffic fatality rates as those counties with the most sprawling development. For example, the traffic fatality rate for the Bronx, NY was approximately four per 100,000 residents. However, for Miami, KS, the rate was almost 40 per 100,000.
Moreover, other recent studies have found that users of public transportation walk more than those who do not use public transit, regardless of income.
The health benefits of public transportation should be given greater consideration in transportation planning, Litman concluded. “A growing portion of households want to rely more on alternative modes and live in more accessible, multi-modal communities,” he wrote. “Accommodating this demand would provide benefits to users and society, including significant health benefits.
Rail opponents in Wisconsin object to spending $810 million in federal funding for several reasons:
1) It’s for trains and we should send it back and trade it for funding for roads
2) The taxpayer subsidy would be close to $10 million a year — we can’t afford that.
3) It’s too expensive. At somewhere between $20 and $33 a ticket, it’s cheaper to drive.
4) No one will ride it.
Let’s take each one of these claims and take a closer look:
1) Its for trains and we should return it—- Can’t do that. The money is for rail only. This is the beginning of a national passenger rail system. If Wisconsin doesn’t get the money, it will go to another state. That means that Wisconsin taxpayers will be funding the development of rail in another state.
2) The taxpayer subsidy is too high— Let’s see. Right now, property taxpayers are paying $1.4 Billion for highways. (In addition to what they pay in taxes at the gas pump and auto registration fees. That means for every penny spent on rail, $1.40 is spent on highways. Dollars for roads and not one penny for rail????
3) It’s too expensive, it’s cheaper to drive— Even at the high and – $33 a ticket, rail is cheaper than driving. At 50 cents a mile (the going federal reimbursement rate), the 84 mile trip between Madison and Milwaukee costs $42 or $10 more than driving.
4) No one will ride it—- The service is really an extension of the current Hiawatha service between Chicago and Milwaukee. That is wildly popular with extra cars having been added to meet the demand. When service was extended to Oconomowoc in the late 1990′s, the trains were standing room only. Just wait til gas prices go up.
Train service will only grow in popularity as the infrastructure gets built and local transit systems get adequate funding.
MILWAUKEE (AP) — Republican candidate for governor Scott Walker says he’s so opposed to high-speed rail that if he’s elected, he’ll give back every cent in federal funding earmarked for the project.
The $810 million for the rail line between Madison and Milwaukee comes from federal stimulus money.
Walker on Monday said even so, the state will be on the hook for $10 million each year in maintenance and other costs.
The Milwaukee County Executive has previously suggested using the money to fix aging infrastructure, but it can only be used for the rail project.
So Walker said he’d give it all back.
Walker and former U.S. Rep. Mark Neumann are the leading GOP candidates for governor. Neumann also opposes high-speed rail. On the Democratic side of the race, Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett supports the project.
Longtime conservationist Emily Earley inducted into Hall of Fame
 Emily Earley, longtime Wisconsin conservationist and a founding board member of the Wisconsin chapter of the Nature Conservancy, can be forgiven for not being able to make it to Stevens Point recently for her induction into the state’s Conservation Hall of Fame. to read on……
The Congress for New Urbanism will host its 19th annual Congress in Madison, Wisconsin on June 1-4. The CNU is now calling for ideas for session tracks, tours and speakers. Please click here to visit the CNU website to post your ideas for the next Congress.
1000 Friends of Wisconsin is helping to sponsor the CNU 19.
CNU 19 in Madison
Drawing on the close relationship Madison has with its agricultural neighbors, CNU 19 will build on the theme of “Growing Local”. The conference will explore linkages that urban communities have with local food production, the food economy and the infrastructure that has developed around this symbiosis.
It’s not just about growing food though. The conference will extend the “Growing Local” theme to include the nurturing of non-agricultural local economies and local connections — from Madison’s burgeoning bicycle industry and bike culture to its commitment to community involvement and participation, and pursuit of growth that reinforces a distinct sense of place.
The region’s balance of vibrant urban life, rural charm, and natural beauty make Madison an ideal backdrop for CNU 19. Confirmed speakers include author and urban historian William Cronon, Trek CEO John Burke, Madison Mayor Dave Cieslewicz, among others.
More on the CNU 19
From the Daily Reporter
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The head of the group representing Wisconsin’s road builders says he’s disappointed the three major candidates for governor all say they oppose toll roads.
Wisconsin Transportation Builders Association executive director Pat Goss said Thursday that despite those positions, the group will continue to lobby for toll roads with the next governor.
Goss said he wasn’t surprised that Republicans Scott Walker and Mark Neumann and Democrat Tom Barrett all say they oppose toll roads. Goss said none of them have said anything different to him in private meetings.
Goss said it’s premature to eliminate any option to assist with transportation funding in Wisconsin.
Transportation needs are primarily paid for with the gas tax, vehicle registration fees and federal money.
AmericanMakeover.tv
Enough with extreme kitchen remodels and plastic surgery – what really needs a makeover is the American city! Our towns, neighborhoods and public spaces have are overrun with ugly sprawl, with huge consequences for our health and environment.
American Makeover is a six-episode web series taking you to six cities across America in search of the antidote to suburban sprawl.
Click here to watch our pilot episode about Atlanta, Georgia and the Glenwood Park Neighborhood built by Charles Brewer.
Sprawl: American Dream or American Nightmare?
Sprawl is devouring farmland and destroying wildlife habitat. It traps us in cars and makes us lazy. Today, the average American spends about three hours per day driving – three hours stuck in traffic, emitting carbon, burning oil, wasting time. The harmful effects of sprawl are well chronicled in recent news stories, books, and documentaries. But what is the alternative?
New Urbanism: The Alternative to Sprawl
New urbanism is about creating interesting and wonderful places to live, work, shop, eat, and play. They are towns and neighborhoods designed so you can get to most places you need to go by walking.
Where are these new urbanist towns and neighborhoods, and what is it really like to live there? That’s what we hope to show you in this new series, American Makeover.
By Matthew Defour
Wisconsin State Journal
 Amtrack Station by Fred Bartol WATERTOWN – Responding to critics of a passenger rail line between Madison and Milwaukee – including the leading Republican candidates for governor who are vowing to stop the project – U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said Thursday the plan is going forward.
“High-speed rail is happening and it’s here to stay,” LaHood said here in announcing the second installment of an $810 million federal grant for the project.
Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker and former U.S. Rep. Mark Neumann, who are seeking the GOP nomination for governor, have called the project a boondoggle and waste of taxpayer money.
Both have said they would halt the project if elected, despite the fact that by the time the new governor takes office, the state will have already spent between $60 million to $100 million on contracts, designs, locomotives and rail cars. That does not include money spent by the four cities along the route on train stations.
Read the entire story
By Joe Yovino
The Daily Reporter
Wisconsin could spend almost $100 million on a high-speed rail line between Milwaukee and Madison by early 2011. And that’s in addition to the more than $40 million on pre-build engineering work during the past five years.
In all, Wisconsin will receive $810 million in stimulus money to build up high-speed rail around the state. That seems like a lot of your cash going toward a project, and it got me thinking about how it compares to the most expensive construction undertakings of all time. After seeing this list from Construction Management School, $810 million seems pretty insignificant.
Read the entire story
|
|
