Contact us: 608-259-1000 or friends@1kfriends.org

Smart Growth

In October 1999, the State of Wisconsin enacted the most ambitious land use legislation in the past two decades.

Why the Law was needed?

Wisconsin’s Comprehensive Planning Legislation ensured that by 2010, every city, village, county and most towns in the state would be guided by a comprehensive plan as defined by state statute.

The law came about in response to four major issues:

Middleton master plan Smart Growth

Master Plan for Middleton Hills

  • As of 1998, only 29% of all Wisconsin communities had any kind of land use plan in place at all.
  • These plans varied widely in their content, quality and age. Some communities had detailed plans covering a wide range of issues that were frequently updated. Other communities had poorly conceived or old plans.
  • Even those communities with good plans often did not invest the time and resources to implement those plans when actual land use decisions were being made.
  • The state offered little guidance on how to improve this situation.

The new law was passed to ensure responsible planning, create a framework such that the planning is implemented, rein in sprawl and enhance the health of our urban and rural communities.

History of Land Use in Wisconsin

Just fourteen years ago, Wisconsin had no statewide plan for land use and we were all paying the price.

From 1950 to 1990:

  • We lost nearly 4 million acres of farmland (that’s larger than the entire state of Connecticut).
  • We added over 10,000 miles of roads and more than doubled the miles we drive each year (almost 60 billion miles annually in Wisconsin).
  • Our land area in southeastern Wisconsin expanded 17 times faster than the rate of population growth.

Losses around the state:

  • In northern Wisconsin, undeveloped lakes became an endangered species. Since the 1960s, about 60% of previously undeveloped lakes 10 acres and larger have been developed with one or more dwellings.
  • Development pressure on the larger lakes has increased by 800% over the same time period. According to a study conducted by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, unless we change our development patterns, all currently undeveloped lakes over ten acres will be developed by 2025.
  • In 1970, most people had never heard of forest fragmentation. Today it is one of the biggest threats to our northern boreal ecosystem. Forest fragmentation is disrupting the natural ecology of wooded areas throughout our northern forests.

By 1990, the land of Leopold, Nelson and Muir was slowly losing its identity, seemingly destined to become a sprawling suburb sandwiched between Chicago and Minneapolis.

The Creation of 1000 Friends

smart growth 2 Smart Growth

In spite of all of these threats, the state had no plans for managing that growth. Nor did it have any organization trying to promote a rational strategy to address growth.

Things started to change in 1996. A group of activists, frustrated by inaction at the state level, were determined to direct growth in ways that benefited the state and individual communities.

They eventually created an organization, called it 1000 Friends of Wisconsin and went to work.

In three short years that small group had made a huge difference.

By working collaboratively with municipalities, counties, builders and realtors, 1000 Friends was able to spearhead the successful effort to pass Wisconsin’s Comprehensive Planning Law in 1999.

From the very start, the program had strong bi-partisan support. Starting with Republican Governor Tommy Thompson who worked with legislators to create the Smart Growth law, Democratic Governor Jim Doyle rescued the program from a repeal of the law contained in the 2005-07 state budget, which was orchestrated by a small group of legislators who misrepresented how the law worked.

The Law

According to the new law, starting in 2000:

  • Communities across the state would be required to enlist their residents in an open, comprehensive planning process that would lead to informed choices about where and when future growth would take place.
  • The planning would be open and comprehensive.
  • Plans would have to address land use impacts related to transportation choices, housing, utilities, economic development, agriculture and intergovernmental concerns.

Gone were the days of “developer’s choice.” Decisions about development would take place openly and with public participation.  Land use decisions would be made in a larger context.

2010 & Beyond

There are a total of 1,923 local governments in Wisconsin. The law required 1,242 communities to develop comprehensive plans by 2010. Currently, 1550 have final plans.  That means many of the local governments are choosing to do comprehensive planning. That represents a very good record of compliance for a new way of doing business in the state.

Until 2010, the plans were advisory. Now, all land use decisions in communities that are required to have plans must be consistent with those plans.smart growth Smart Growth

That means that the vision that was created through the comprehensive planning process has a meaning that no other plans have had. Instead of gathering dust on a shelf, comprehensive plans are dynamic documents that will guide land use decisions in a community. The plan represents a vision and the actions of a community will have to make that image a reality.

If a land use decision is not consistent with the plan, either the land use decision is not allowed – or the plan must be amended. That amendment must allow citizen input, ensuring public participation in changes to the plan.

The comprehensive plan is meant to be dynamic – changing with changing times, changing economics and changing demographics.  While communities are encouraged to revisit their plans as needed, all communities are required to update their plans at least once every ten years.

All land use decisions carry a certain amount of controversy.  We have had to fight repeal efforts almost every session of the legislature. But, for the first time in the state’s history, comprehensive planning with public participation is the law. It may be the state’s best chance to hold on to the legacy of Gaylord Nelson, John Muir and Aldo Leopold.

Read the Citizen’s Guide to Land Use in Wisconsin.

citizens guide Smart Growth

MAKE A CONTRIBUTION
DN2Button GreenLarge Smart Growth